RESUMO
As healthcare costs continue to rise, the importance of delivering high-value healthcare increases. The volume of carpal tunnel release surgeries performed annually generates a significant cost burden for the healthcare system. The fundamental expenses of carpal tunnel release surgery are facility fees, anesthesia fees, and surgeon fees. Performing open carpal tunnel release surgeries in the clinic utilizing local anesthesia and field sterilization minimizes facility and anesthesia costs. We compared patient outcomes, as measured by infection and revision rates, between hospital-based, ambulatory surgery center-based, and clinic-based carpal tunnel release operations. Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were treated with isolated mini-open carpal tunnel release procedures by three fellowship-trained hand surgeons: 12 patients had hospital-based procedures, 229 had ASC-based procedures, and 147 had clinic-based procedures. All procedures were performed using a mini-open approach. No patients were diagnosed with deep infections post-procedurally, irrespective of venue. Our results show no significant difference in outcomes between venues. Therefore, we conclude that the outcomes of open carpal tunnel release surgeries performed in the clinic were not inferior to carpal tunnel release operations performed at the ambulatory surgery center or the hospital. The cost savings from field sterilization, local anesthesia, and the absence of a facility fee provide an opportunity to expand high-value care.
